As international
interaction has increased and integration has spread to different aspects of life,
globalization has brought significant advantages as well as disadvantages
towards people around the world. While people are pursuing their
self-interests, they have become worried about problems caused by increasing
immigration issues. Immigration, induced by globalization, is a double-edged
sword. Although it may facilitate academic exchanges and technological
advancement, immigrants may result in a heavier burden upon the host countries,
especially in the fields of job opportunities, culture and cost of education.
To address these problems, two methods can be implemented: taking a stricter
immigration policy and offering workers a path to citizenship. However, these
solutions need to be carefully evaluated according to effectiveness before the actual
implementation.
Increasing immigration has
a variety of adverse effects on the global human society. First and foremost,
immigrants may compete for job opportunities and increase the cost on education.
According to the statistics updated by Singapore Department of Statistics in
2012, Singaporean labor force consists of more than 25% foreign workforce (Huang,
2013), which caused great concern among the native people because of difficulties
in finding a job. Besides, due to more expense on language courses for immigrant
children, the extra cost on education is approximately 11.2 billion US dollars
(Mcnatt & Benassi, 2006). In spite of the more intense competitive market
of opportunities and higher cost on education, immigrant issues may also
threaten the security. For example, it was reported in 2007, that one fifth of
the crimes in London were committed by the foreigners (Harper & Leapman, 2007).
In order to minimize the adverse effects immigration brought, one method
involves taking stricter immigration policies. For instance, UK has laws to increase
fines on companies which apply illegal immigrant workers and to force native
landlords to check the immigration status of their foreign tenants (Castle, 2013).
Besides, the US is implementing a nationwide system of biometric
identification for foreigners, which prevents employers from
hiring undocumented immigrants (The White House, 2013). This method
is relatively effective in ameliorating the immigration problems, because decreasing
employment opportunities would eliminate the desire to come into the country
illegally. Nonetheless, it may hurt business as technological immigrant labor
may also develop the economic growth. In addition, this method may also cause
immigrants to protest against the government in terms of equality. Hence, the
government should identify what attracts immigrants most and reduce benefits of
immigrants in that area. In this way, immigrants, considering benefits and
costs of immigration, might be less willing to immigrate.
Another method is to grant
workers a path to gain citizenship. The US government attempted amnesty in 1986
and benefited 2.8 million undocumented immigrants. Therefore, these foreigners
who illegally gained entry into the US are forgiven and offered an access to
legal citizens after payments of taxes and fines (Espinosa, 2013).
This method is not as effective as the previous solution. Some assert this
method works because the taxes and fines were costly, which led to a phenomenon
that many illegal workers returned to their home countries (Espinosa, 2013).
However, opponents claim that granting amnesty only encourages more illegal
immigration, because illegal immigrants may have a chance to stay in the host
country and become legal citizens. Hence, to improve this method, government
could collect the more detailed background information of the applicants for
amnesty, evaluate them in terms of a list of stricter criteria, and force them
to pay their taxes and fines. In addition, establish a program that prevents
fraud in the applications may lead this method to a more effective way.
In conclusion, immigration
has caused many problems to the native population and the host countries. To
address these problems, two possible solutions can be implemented: tougher
immigration policies and offering workers a path to citizenship. However, as
each solution has its advantages and disadvantages, no solution is a panacea to
such a complex issue. Therefore, a combination of various solutions may solve
the problem more effectively.
References:
Huang, E. (2013, Mar. 18). Growing number of migrant workers stirs debate in Singapore.
Retrieved from http://www.aseannews.net/growing-number-of-migrant-workers-stirs-debate-in-singapore/
Mcnatt, R., Benassi, F. (2006, April. 4). Econ 101 in illegal immigrants. Retrieved
from http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2006-04-06/econ-101-on-illegal-immigrantsbusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice
Harper, T., Leapman, B. (2007, Sep. 23). Foreigners ‘commit fifth of crime in London’. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1563890/Foreigners-commit-fifth-of-crime-in-London.html
Castle, S. (2013, May. 8). British government moves to toughen rules on immigrants. Retrieved
from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/09/world/europe/britain-urges-tougher-immigration-laws.html?_r=0
The White House, Office of the Press
Secretary. (2013, Jan. 29). Fact sheet: fixing
our broken immigration system so everyone plays by the rules. [Immediate
Release] Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/01/29/fact-sheet-fixing-our-broken-immigration-system-so-everyone-plays-rules
Espinosa, H. ABS CBN North America Bureau. (2013, Jun. 6). Special report: the cost of legalization in
US. Retrieved from http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/global-filipino/06/06/13/special-report-cost-legalization-us
No comments:
Post a Comment